Legal Opinion
PANOMA CORPORATION v. Texas Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 7, 1955No. 36111PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, - Panoma Corporation, is the assignee of the plaintiff in error, D. D. Harrington, and the successor to his interest in certain oil and gas lease assignments exchanged between Harrington and defendant in error, The Texas Company, pursuant to a very lengthy, involved and comprehensive contract entered into by the latter two parties in 1946. In the interest of brevity, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as “Panoma”, “Harrington”, and “Texaco”.
It was set forth in the contract between Harrington and Texaco that each party owned oil and gas leases in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Cabot Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988