Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Rummel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 9, 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
223 N.J. Super. 15 (1988)
537 A.2d 1314
ROSE CUNNINGHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ELIZABETH RUMMEL AND WILLIAM RUMMEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 4, 1988.
Decided February 9, 1988.
Before Judges COLEMAN, HAVEY and STERN.
Steven L. Kessel argued the cause for appellant (Drazin & Warshaw, attorneys; Steven L. Kessel on the brief).
John Lee argued the cause for respondents (Campbell, Foley, Lee, Murphy & Cernigliaro, attorneys; Stephen J. Foley, Jr., on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.
In this personal injury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Jansson v. Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Passaic County Probation Officers' Ass'n v. County of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Abtrax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Elkins-Sinn, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Hammock Ex Rel. Hammock v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Cavallaro v. Jamco Property Mgt.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Mesgleski v. OraboniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.