Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1990No. 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Carlie Mitchell appeals nunc pro tunc from his conviction for murder in the first degree, arson, robbery, rape, criminal conspiracy, possessing an instrument of crime, and risking a catastrophe. He presents four arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court improperly allowed impeachment by evidence of prior arrests without convictions; (2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a charge on voluntariness of confessions; (3) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to hearsay testimony; and (4) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. McCloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. BufordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Detterline v. D'Ambrosio's Dodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API