Legal Opinion

De La Fuente v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 1, 2008No. 04-06-00838-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

Daniel De la Fuente appeals his conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity and theft in the aggregate value of $200,000 or more. De la Fuente chiefly complains that: 1) the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at trial; 2) he was subjected to multiple punishments for the same offense when he was convicted and sentenced for both engaging in organized criminal activity with theft as the underlying offense, and theft; and 3) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction. Wé…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  2. Cesar Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  3. Amador L. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  4. Daniel Ray Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  5. Desiree Boltos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API