Legal Opinion

Bolognesi v. Hirzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Alessandro Bolognesi and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered- in the office- of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of November, 1900, granting the defendants’ motion requiring the plaintiffs to give a bill of particulars or to stipulate that they will confine their claim to' general damages.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

This action is brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract. The complaint alleges that the defendants. were the gen*531eral agents in the United States of the ISTavigazione Generale Itiliana, a steamship company running lines between ports of Italy and Hew York; that they made a contract with the plaintiffs by which the plaintiffs were to take sole and exclusive charge of the passenger business of the.steamship company and do various things connected therewith, and the defendants agreed to pay them one-half of the commission of five per cent, which the steamship company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. HandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhinelander Refrigerator Co. v. RothenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1928
  2. Diamond Mills Paper Co. v. Independent Peerless Pattern Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API