Barry v. Barry
California Supreme Court
Appeal by defendant from a final judgment in partition, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Twenty-second District Court. Temple, J. The motion for a new trial was made with reference to the final judgment, and denied by the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The appeal is from the final judgment in an action for a partition of real property, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made after that judgment was entered. The final judgment was entered May 31st, 1878, and, after confirming the report of the referee or commissioners appointed by the interlocutory decree hereinafter mentioned, adjudged the partition accomplished in accordance with such report.
*11The interlocutory decree—determining the rights and interests of. the several parties as tenants in common, adjudging that a partition should be had, and appointing…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Abbott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Raisin Investment Co. v. MagginettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952