Legal Opinion

(PC) Taylor v. Medina

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 13, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00450Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2: 19-cv-00450 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 KUERSTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s counsel is relieved from 19 representing plaintiff and plaintiff shall proceed pro se.1 20 On May 11, 2021, plaintiff’s counsel filed a form titled “Consent Order Granting 21 Substitution of Attorney.” (ECF No. 92.) In this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. SturdevantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Vachula v. General Electric Capital Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API