Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 1983No. AM-239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

Curtis Von Woodard appeals from the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s assignment of a presumptive parole release date. Woodard claims that the Commission used the wrong severity of offense of conviction in calculating his matrix time range. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-21.-09(2) requires the Commission to determine “the degree of felony or misdemeanor of the present offense of conviction.” Woodard claims that he was convicted of robbery without the use of any weapon, a second degree felony under § 812.13(2)(c), Florida Statutes. The Commission claims that he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Bennett v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API