Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Marriage of Helmich

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1997No. 95CA1658Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge CRISWELL

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with Part II of the majority’s opinion in which it concludes that a punitive sentence imposed under C.R.C.P. 107 must be subject to a “good time” credit under *901§§ 17-26-109 and 17-26-115, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A). However, because I am convinced that the result of Part I of the majority’s opinion is to thwart the will of the General Assembly, as that will is evidenced by § 18-1-1002, C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.), I respectfully dissent from that part of the opinion.

As the majority notes, defendant relies upon § 18-1-1002, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Hidden Lake Development Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. People v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API