Legal Opinion
State v. Hagen
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 23, 1990No. 900095-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Before GARFF, JACKSON and ORME, JJ., sitting in Vernal, Utah 1 . ORME, Judge:
Defendant appeals his conviction on the narrow ground that the crime for which he was convicted, selling marijuana, was committed at Myton, Utah, a location within the territorial confines of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation, and that the state failed to establish the court’s jurisdiction over him when it failed to prove he is not an Indian when confronted with his claim that he is. See, e.g., State v. St. Francis, 151 Vt. 384, 563 A.2d 249, 251 (1989) (“If defendants are ‘Indians’ and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Cloud v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- Goforth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
- State v. St. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Sully v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Ute Indian Tribe Of The Uintah And Ouray Reservation v. State Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.