Legal Opinion

Douglas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1950No. 32832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The defendant was convicted under Code § 13-9933. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and he assigns error here. The facts are that the defendant was in prison in Quincy, Florida, and the prosecutor, Tifton Mills, went to Quincy and obtained the release of the defendant. The defendant thereafter executed to Mills a note for $300 to compensate Mills for the amount expended for the release of the defendant. Thereafter, when the note was past due, the defendant gave to Mills a check for the amount of the note. At the time the check was given, the defendant did not obtain the note. So far…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. McGee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Mobley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Albert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Driskell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Sinclair & Sinwellan Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Vasser v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Joseph P. McCloskey, C/P Joseph Patrick McCloskeySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
  5. Pueblo v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API