Legal Opinion

Lane v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Miami District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts. At the May Term, 1883, plaintiff Lane had judgment for $8.5(5 against the defendant Railroad Company. To reverse this judgment, and also the order overruling his motion for a new trial, Lane brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by George W. Lane against the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf railroad company, to recover damages for negligently killing two of the plaintiff’s cows at a public crossing, and appropriating the hides to its own use. The answer was a general denial. Before the trial, the defendant offered to confess judgment for the value of the hides, $8.50, and the offer was declined. The case was tried before the court and a jury, and the jury found a general verdict in favor of the plaintiff arid against the defendant for the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API