Day v. United States
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit against the government to recover Basic Allowance for Quarters (hereinafter BAQ) pursuant to 37 U.S.C. § 403. There being no genuine issues of fact, both parties moved for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2).
Plaintiffs represent the class of all unmarried officers without dependents who, while serving in the Air Force, were permanently stationed in Thailand during some portion of the period from January 27, 1970 through January 26, 1976 and who were assigned to quarters of the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jacobs v. StetsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1978