Legal Opinion
Schindel v. Cummings
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 8, 1981No. 80-2718PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The issue on this appeal is whether the District Court erred or abused its discretion in dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Territorial Court because of the appellants’ failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Rules of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Five years ago, in December 1976, appellee Nancy P. Schindel filed an action in the Territorial Court seeking damages and injunctive relief against Pelican Beach, Inc., and Robert and Katherine Cummings for breach of several covenants set forth in a deed to property fronting…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury, Serial Number 237590Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- In the Matter of Pyramid Mobile Homes, Inc., Bankrupt. Pyramid Mobile Homes, Inc. v. James Speake, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Business Forms Finishing Service, Inc., and Raymond P. Glowiak, Counterclaim v. Palmer A. Carson and Henry KovachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Salem M. Alnajjar v. Ford Motor Company and Ernest R. BreechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Karpouzis v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Georges v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997