Seibert v. State

After Remandment by the Supreme Court

TYSON, Presiding Judge.

The dilemma with which this Court was initially confronted by the first remand-*788merit by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976, 343 So.2d 784, was that we did not understand that this Court could review the action of the trial court in considering the coram nobis proceeding together with the original trial proceedings after the reversal of our first opinion.

We now understand, under the second mandate of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976, 343 So.2d 786, that we are not precluded from reviewing the judgment of the trial court, dated…