Frey v. Ketcham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Where, as here, the parties have entered into an agreement concerning custody, it will not be modified absent a change in circumstances, and unless a modification would be in the best interests of the child” (Matter of Battista v Fasano, 41 AD3d 712, 713 [2007]; see Smoczkiewicz v Smoczkiewicz, 2 AD3d 705, 706 [2003]). “Factors to be considered include ‘the quality of the home environment and the parental guidance the custodial parent provides for the child, the ability of each parent to provide for the child’s emotional and intellectual development, the financial status and ability of each…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Young v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Miller v. PipiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kaplan v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Smoczkiewicz v. SmoczkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Selliah v. PenamenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Donovan C. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Schick v. SchickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Peterson v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Turkashwand v. BrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.