Legal Opinion
Cardoza v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 27, 2012No. 3D09-2881PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLagoa, J.
Jose Cardoza (“Cardoza”) and Continental Heritage Insurance Company (“Continental”) (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal an Order Denying Surety’s Motion to Vacate Judgment. For the following reasons, we reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 22, 2009, Cardoza was arrested and charged with several offenses. On June 23, after making his first court appearance, Cardoza was released from custody upon posting a $5000 appearance *1218bond; Dade County Bail Bond was the surety agent for Continental.1 Upon Car-doza’s failure to appear at the July 13 arraignment, the trial court issued an alias…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kroier v. KroierSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. BaileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Ferlita v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Kash N'Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Ramsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CINDY STUART, CLERK AND COMPTROLLER FOR 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Palmetto Surety Corp. v. Escambia County Clerk of CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026