Legal Opinion

Stewart & Irwin v. Johnson Realty, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1993No. 54A05-9303-CV-107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

The law firm of Stewart & Irwin appeals the trial court's order requiring it to pay into the Clerk of the court proceeds from a settlement negotiated on behalf of a former client. We address the following rephrased issues: 1) did the trial court have personal jurisdiction over the law firm, and 2) where an attorney asserts a retaining lien over funds in his possession, may the trial court order the funds deposited with the Clerk of the court.

We affirm.

The record in this case reveals the following. Represented by Stewart & Irwin, Johnson Realty, Inc., filed suit against Indiana…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. RansburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Shannon v. Hendricks Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. McKim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. State Ex Rel. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API