State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. Owens

Fátzer, J.,

concurring and dissenting: I do not find the issues of this case as simple and straightforward as does the court. For me, the record is not susceptible to the reading given it. The court has proceeded to declare portions of the 1966 juvenile code (L. 1965, Chs. 278, 279, 280, effective January 1,1966) unconstitutional purely upon the assumption that some of the questions decided are presented in the record1. I would rest the decision of this case solely on the basis that the judge of the juvenile court of Sedgwick County had jurisdiction of the alleged wayward child it discharged…