Legal Opinion

Forgan v. McKenzie

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

The plaintiffs have moved pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a summary-judgment based upon the first cause of action set forth in the complaint. The defendant, Jack W. Mulford, has made a cross motion for a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety upon the ground that the plaintiffs have failed to state any cause of action.

The action arises out of an alleged contract for the purchase and sale of certain real property and a business known as Scot-Noose Park or Ron-Nels Restaurant and Beach, Town of Vienna, Oneida County, New York. The contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Momberger v. Maleca Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Shea v. NewkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. McGrath v. McGrath (In re McGrath)District Court, E.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API