Package Machinery Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*986OPINION.
Arundell:
The deduction claimed by the petitioner in its return and allowed by the respondent for compensation for personal services actually rendered amounted to $117,615.17, which is the total of cash paid, $71,065.17, plus the par value, $46,550, of stock issued under the resolution of July 21, 1921. The petitioner contends it is entitled to a deduction of $170,682.17, this being the total of cash paid, plus the fair market value, $99,617, of the stock so issued, and represents an increase of $53,067 over the amount deducted and allowed. This increase of $58,067, it will be noted,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- In re Stoddard Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1909
- Commercial Inv. Trust Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Hub Dress Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollywood Baseball Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Brooklyn Radio Service Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Hollywood Baseball Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
- Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935