Legal Opinion

Package Machinery Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 8, 1933No. Docket No. 54334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*986OPINION.

Arundell:

The deduction claimed by the petitioner in its return and allowed by the respondent for compensation for personal services actually rendered amounted to $117,615.17, which is the total of cash paid, $71,065.17, plus the par value, $46,550, of stock issued under the resolution of July 21, 1921. The petitioner contends it is entitled to a deduction of $170,682.17, this being the total of cash paid, plus the fair market value, $99,617, of the stock so issued, and represents an increase of $53,067 over the amount deducted and allowed. This increase of $58,067, it will be noted,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. In re Stoddard Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1909
  3. Commercial Inv. Trust Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Hub Dress Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hollywood Baseball Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Brooklyn Radio Service Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Hollywood Baseball Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  5. Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API