Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Standard Accident Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1961No. Civ. 25495PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalthis, J.

On September 5, 1953, at the controlled intersection of certain highways, the automobiles of plaintiff Hodges and Richard Baurmann were involved in a collision. Each driver contended that he had the green light in his favor on entering the intersection. Standard Accident Insurance Company had issued a policy in favor of the Baurmanns (the singular is used hereafter) and the policy limits were $10,000 for damages for personal injuries to one person and $20,000 for damages to more than one person. By the terms of the policy the insurer was bound to defend any actions for damages claimed against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Ivy v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Ivy v. Pacific Automobile Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Murach v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API