Legal Opinion

Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 3, 2018No. 1:17-cv-06730Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KARMEL AL HAJ, individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) 17 C 6730 Plaintiff, ) ) Judge Gary Feinerman vs. ) ) PFIZER INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On behalf of himself and a putative nationwide class, Karmel Al Haj alleges in this diversity suit that Pfizer Inc. deceives consumers by charging more for “Maximum Strength” Robitussin cough syrup than for “Regular Strength” Robitussin even though the former has a lower concentration of active ingredients than the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API