In re Adjudication of Claims of Abraham

OPINION

By BIRRELL, J.

On the motion for new trial in this case only two matters were discussed in the argument; one of which was that the Verdict is not sus*432tained by sufficient evidence, and the other that the Court erred in charging the Jury before the close of the case.

With reference to the charge to the Jury before the close of the case, the Court has, many times, explained its rulings to a Jury. On a particularly strenuous objection made by Counsel for the Claimant during the argument of the State’s Attorney in this case, the Court proceeded to explain to the Jury the reason for overruling…