Legal Opinion
In Re Fuller
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 1, 1926No. 5PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge'
(after stating the facts as above).
That the petition as it stood on June 26, 1922, was insufficient both sides must agree. In re Nelson (D. C.) 98 F. 76; In re Rosenblatt, 193 F. 638, 113 C. C. A. 506 (C. C. A. 2); In re Condon, 209 F. 800, 126 C. C. A. 524 (C. C. A. 2); In re Triangle S. S. Co. (D. C.) 267 F. 300, 303. The question is whether the allegation of the act of bankruptcy might be amended, or amplified by bill of particulars, for we can see no difference in substance between the two methods. It is settled that if the petition alleges a specific act of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re Sig. H. Rosenblatt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- In re CondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- In re HaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Hovland v. Farmers' State Bank of ChristineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- In re BielerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Manati Sugar Co. v. MockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Glint Factors, Inc. v. SchnappCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Dworsky v. Alanjay Bias Binding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- In Re S. W. Straus & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In re Gaynor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.