Legal Opinion

Bridgeforth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Law and'Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert. (This case was reviewed by the Supreme Court on certiorari to the Court of Appeals, and the writ denied. See Ex parteBridgeforth v. The -State, 198 Ala., 74 South. 1005.) Robert Bridgeforth, Junior, was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] (This case was reviewed by the Supreme Court on certiorari to the Court of Appeals, and the writ denied. See Ex parteBridgeforth v. The State, 198 Ala., 74 So. 1005.)

Robert Bridgeforth, Junior, was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals. Affirmed. The affidavit or complaint on which the defendant was tried charges in the language of the statute then in force that he "sold, offered for sale, kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of spirituous,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Raiford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gettings v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Trent v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Rolls v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Ott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Bridgeforth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API