Farming Corp. v. Bridgeport Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Shepherd, District Judge.
This is a case in which the plaintiffs sue the defendant for the conversion of $1,500 in cash and a $2,750 mortgage deposited by them in escrow with it, alleging that, because of the failure of the Bridgeport Irrigation District to extend and improve its ditches according to a contract with plaintiffs (which contract was deposited in escrow with the money and mortgage), said money and mortgage should have been returned to them, but was not, although they made due demand for the same.
The defendant, which is a bank, filed an affidavit of inter-pleader, in which it says…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shellenberg v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Cummins v. People's Building, Loan & Savings Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance v. CummingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Sliscovich v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Ehlers v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Stark v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Hansen v. Village of RalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.