Legal Opinion

Farming Corp. v. Bridgeport Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1925No. 23039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

This is a case in which the plaintiffs sue the defendant for the conversion of $1,500 in cash and a $2,750 mortgage deposited by them in escrow with it, alleging that, because of the failure of the Bridgeport Irrigation District to extend and improve its ditches according to a contract with plaintiffs (which contract was deposited in escrow with the money and mortgage), said money and mortgage should have been returned to them, but was not, although they made due demand for the same.

The defendant, which is a bank, filed an affidavit of inter-pleader, in which it says…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shellenberg v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cummins v. People's Building, Loan & Savings Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance v. CummingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sliscovich v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ehlers v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stark v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Hansen v. Village of RalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API