Legal Opinion

Dallas v. . Wagner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe question involved: “Did tbe trial judge commit, error in refusing to grant tbe defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence?” We tbink so. ■

Tbe contract as to tbe (1) man’s diamond pin and (2) man’s diamond ring, was as follows: “And we guarantee tbe above genuine diamond— special remarks: Will loan $250.00 . . . witbin one year from above date.”

A guarantee.is be to whom a guaranty is made: Tbe contracts were special guaranties to plaintiff. If tbe diamond pin and ring were not genuine diamonds, tbe plaintiff bad a cause of action on tbe contract of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corley Co. v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Potter v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Potter v. National Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Styron v. Loman-Garrett Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Breece v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API