Legal Opinion

Znamanacek v. Jelinek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1903No. 12,855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Saline county: George W. Stubbs, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

This is an action for damages, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff on account of a dam constructed by the defendant across a stream of water, whereby the water was thrown back on the lands of the. plaintiff. A trial to the court, without a jury, resulted in a general finding for the defendant and judgment was given accordingly. The plaintiff brings error.

It is conclusively established that in 1882, the defendant was the owner of two quarter sections of land, adjoining each other, one of which we shall call the east, the other, the west quarter. A small stream of water…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. GaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gilmore v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Arterburn v. BeardNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Keim v. DowningNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. First Investment Co. v. State Fire MarshalNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API