Legal Opinion

Boaz v. Swinney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1909No. 15,769PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*333The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is a suit for partition. The only controversy arises over the interest of defendant in error Irene Boaz Swinney, who claims to be an heir by adoption. The suit was commenced in the district court of Jewell county, where she was held to have an interest in the land, and the defendants bring the case here for review.

Irene Boaz Swinney was adopted as the child of Asa Boaz and his wife, Mary G. Boaz, under the law of the state of Illinois. The éffeet of such adoption, as stated in the law of that state, so far as necessary to be considered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Matre v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Keegan v. GeraghtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Parsons v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Helms v. ElliottTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Turner Bros. v. Argo & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. BryantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dreyer v. SchrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Riley v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Fett v. RiemannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Rogers v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API