Legal Opinion

Hill v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1933No. 3459PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.

The petition to review the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in this case raises the question whether the sum of $25,000, received by the taxpayer from Union Bleaehery, a South Carolina corporation, in the year 1927, should be considered a dividend under section 201 (g) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 10, 11 (26 USCA § 932 (g), or a distribution in partial liquidation of the corporation, under section 201 (c) of that act (26 USCA § 932 (e).

Union Bleaehery was incorporated on or about July 1,1922, with an authorized capital stock of the par value of…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Hyman v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  5. Kessner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API