Legal Opinion

Tender Years Learning Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 27, 2017No. 15-719CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claim for Bid and Proposal Preparation Costs; Attorneys’ Fees; Implied-In-Fact Contract; Prejudice; Motion to Dismiss; Mootness; Damages.

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

The parties in this breach of implied-in-fact contract case have filed cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff Tender Years Learning Corporation (“Tender Years”), the losing bidder on a funding contract to run a Head Start program in Macon, Bibb and Monroe Counties in Georgia, alleges primarily that the United States Government, through…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gateway Development Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  2. Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API