Tender Years Learning Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Claim for Bid and Proposal Preparation Costs; Attorneys’ Fees; Implied-In-Fact Contract; Prejudice; Motion to Dismiss; Mootness; Damages.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
The parties in this breach of implied-in-fact contract case have filed cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff Tender Years Learning Corporation (“Tender Years”), the losing bidder on a funding contract to run a Head Start program in Macon, Bibb and Monroe Counties in Georgia, alleges primarily that the United States Government, through…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gateway Development Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025