Legal Opinion

Sherrard v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1983No. [No. 42 (Adv.), September Term, 1983.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari having been granted, we adopt the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Paul E. Alpert of the Court of Special Appeals in Sherrard v. Hull, 53 Md. App. 553, 456 A.2d 59 (1983), and affirm the judgment of that Court.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.

Costs to be paid by the petitioner.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherrard v. HullCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leese v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Miner v. NovotnyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. In Re: Ibp Confidential Business Documents Litigation. Hughes A. Bagley v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Sherwood Webster v. Sun Company, Inc. Webster-Heise Corporation v. Sun Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Happy 40, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API