State ex rel. Howard v. City of Wichita Falls
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
The question determinative of the case presented on appeal is whether its possession of the easement for pipeline purposes entitled the City of Wichita Falls, Texas to annex territory outside its territorial jurisdiction.
The Municipal Annexation Act, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.St. Art. 970a, Sec. 7, subd. A, reads as follows: “A city may annex territory only within the confines of its extraterritorial jurisdiction; provided, however, that such limitation shall not apply to the annexation of property owned by the city annexing the same.”
Approximately nine miles from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- L. E. Whitham & Co. v. GambrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Waco v. City of McGregorTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Waco v. City of McGregorTexas Supreme Court · 1975