Legal Opinion

Spradley v. Kemp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1992No. 91-3068Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of an order which dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.

Appellant filed a complaint alleging a violation of his civil rights based upon the *507actions of various Department of Corrections’ employees. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We have reviewed appellant’s brief and the record. Unfortunately, the appel-lees affirmatively chose not to file a brief.1 Admittedly, appellees are not required to file a brief, Board of Optometry v. Florida Society of Ophthalmology, 538 So.2d 878, 889 (Fla.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Bd. of Optometry v. FLA. SOC. OF OPHTH.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Lakes of Emerald Hills v. SilvermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API