Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Hardee

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 13, 1935No. 6394PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Federal-American National Bank & Trust Company of Washington was organized under the national banking laws, and prior to March 6, 1933, was engaged in banking in the District of Columbia. On the latter date the bank was closed by presidential proclamation, and on March 14, 1933, a conservator was appointed by the Comptroller. Later, on November 1, 1933, the Comptroller appointed appellee receiver.

There is in effect in the District of Columbia a statute as follows:

“Each national bank as the trustee for its stockholders, through its president or cashier, and all other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Columbia National Bank of Washington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. District of Columbia v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Vance v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
  5. Cogger v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API