Sweeney v. Stroud
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On motion to set aside judgment entered on bond and warrant.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The defendant having obtained a rule to se.t aside a judgment entered against him in this court upon a bond and warrant of attorney, now moves to make the rule absolute.
The brief of counsel bases the motion upon certain proceedings in the Court of Chancery, the effect of which is claimed to be a complete satisfaction of the bond; but, as no proofs have been taken under the rule, those proceedings are not before us, and, consequently, the foundation of fact necessary for the support of his argument is wanting.
But upon the face of the papers, by…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Charleston Heights Co. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- McComb v. RobelenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
- Newark v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Taylor Motor Car Co. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of HazeltineHudson County Surrogate's Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.