Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 1987No. C86-05-32370; CA A43331Published

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial of robbery in the first degree. He did not testify at trial. He had requested Uniform Criminal Jury Instruction 10.14:

“A defendant has an absolute constitutional right not to testify. Therefore, a defendant’s decision not to testify cannot be considered as an indication of guilt. It should not be commented upon or in any way considered by you in your deliberation.”

The trial court did not give that instruction. Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the failure to give the requested instruction is reversible error. We agree. State v. Hale, 22…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. State v. KetchumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API