Legal Opinion

Lo Pong v. Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1916No. 4569PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Habeas corpus by Lo Pong, alias Lo Bong, against James R. Dunn, Inspector in Charge, Immigration Service, Department of Labor. From a judgment dismissing the writ, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

[1] The appellant, Lo Pong, a Chinese person, was arrested by the respondent, an immigration inspector, under a warrant issued by the Secretary of Labor, charging him with being found in the United States in violation of section 6 of the Chinese Exclusion Act, as amended by Act July 5, 1884, c. 220, 23 Stat. 116, having secured admission on a fraudulently procured certificate. He was accorded a hearing and a transcript of the proceedings at the hearing was submitted to the Secretary of Labor, who ordered his deportation. Appellant then obtained a writ of habeas corpus,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Tang Tun v. EdsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lo Hop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  2. Moy Kong Chiu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  3. Woo Shing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. United States v. Woo JanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API