Legal Opinion

Iler v. Dillman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1914No. Civil No. 1409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS BY THE COURT.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge. STATEMENT OP PACTS BY THE COURT. Bessie Anna Iler filed a petition in the superior court alleging that she is the mother of Henry Le Roy Dillman ,• that Howard Pay Dillman is the father of said child; that petitioner and Howard Pay Dillman were married, and that they were divorced by decree of the court; that Henry Le Roy Dill-man is a child of six years of age, and praying that she be appointed guardian. By an order of the court previously made, the custody and care of such minor was awarded to…

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The appellant contends in argument that under the law and the evidence the appellant should have been awarded the guardianship of the child, for two reasons: First, because the evidence tends to show that the father, Howard F. Dillman, expressed a willingness that the mother should have the child before he filed his petition; and that he ought not to have been permitted to file his petition after the issues raised on the first petition had been submitted. The appellant’s assignment of errors are: (1) that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a rehearing. The assignment evidently…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradstreet v. BradstreetArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re CloughArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Guardianship of CantwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Phillips v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Harrah v. RodgersArizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API