Legal Opinion

Levin v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sued defendant in unlawful detainer and had judgment for possession and for $325 damages. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff is the owner of a residence which he leased to defendant for a period of 21 months, beginning July 15, 1941, and which defendant held over, under the lease, from month to month, after the Emergency Price Control Act (50 U.S.C.A. Sec. 90 et seq.) came into existence. The lease provided that defendant should not, without the written consent of plaintiff, "make any alteration, amendments or additions to any of the buildings on said premises, or fixtures therein, * * *."…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davenport v. MagoonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Black River Improvement Co. v. HolwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Heiple v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cross v. NeeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1937
  5. City of Hannibal v. WinchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirkley v. SeipeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Ten-Six Olive, Inc. v. CurbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  3. Pollock v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Western Petroleum Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API