Legal Opinion
Christopher Curran v. Arkansas Client Security Fund Committee
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 8, 2022Published
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2022 Ark. 217
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-22-314 Opinion Delivered December 8, 2022 CHRISTOPHER CURRAN APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANT CLIENT SECURITY FUND COMMITTEE, AN ORIGINAL V. ACTION [NO. CSF 2022-007] ARKANSAS CLIENT SECURITY FUND COMMITTEE APPELLEE AFFIRMED. JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice Appellant Christopher Curran, appearing pro se, appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Client Security Fund Committee (Committee).1 For reversal, Curran argues that the Committee erred in denying his application for the reimbursement of client funds. We affirm. 1 We treat appeals from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jewell v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Healthcare Recoveries, Inc. v. Arkansas Client Security FundSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Nosal v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Charles Dwain Oliver, Arkansas Bar No. 2001009 v. Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020