Legal Opinion

Holtum v. Germania Life Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1903No. S.F. No. 2473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was commenced by plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Karie Holtum, deceased, upon two certain policies of life insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of deceased. In defense it was charged that the defendant was induced to issue the policies by the false representations of the deceased. Trial was had before a jury. The verdict of the jury was for the plaintiff.

The representations which it is charged were false consisted of deceased’s answers to certain questions propounded to her in her application for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insurance Company v. FoleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Tide Land Reclamation Co. v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Schon v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API