Legal Opinion

Gianella v. Haffner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 6, 1933No. 12,785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Gianella, defendant in error as Haffner, his deceased wife as Mrs. Haffner, trustees under her will as the trustees, and the property involved as A. Since the trial below Gianella has died and his executor has been substituted here. For convenience, however, we use the name of the original party.

Haffner sued Gianella for an accounting. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. A jury was waived and the cause was tried to the court, which found for Haffner in the sum of approximately $1,000 and entered judgment accordingly. To review that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rittmaster v. BrisbaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Lathrop v. TracySupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. Haffner v. Van BlarcomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saccomano v. North Idaho Shingle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Saccomano v. North Idaho Shingle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API