Legal Opinion · Dissent

Care and Treatment of Chandler v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 2009No. 26640Published

1Dissent

Justice PLEICONES:

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, there is evidence in the record which supports the probable cause hearing judge’s conclusion that respondent does not suffer from “a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes him likely to engage in acts of sexual violence if not confined in a secure facility for long-term control, care, and treatment.” S.C.Code Ann. § 44-48-30(1)(b) (Supp.2007) (definition of sexually violent predator); In the Matter of Brown, 372 S.C. 611, 643 S.E.2d 118 (Ct.App.2007) (any evidence scope of review on appeal from probable cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Care and Treatment of Beaver v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Care and Treatment of Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API