Legal Opinion

Joseph M. Aragon v. R. A. Wathen and C. A. Young

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1965No. 20149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from dismissal of a complaint asserting a claim under the Civil Rights Acts. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343. The appellant is a prisoner under conviction by a state court, and he alleges that prison authorities, the appellees, conspired to prevent his converting a government bond into cash. He asserts that he was thereby unlawfully deprived of a constitutional right.

The District Court properly dismissed the action. Appellant’s grievance is not of such quality as will support a claim for relief under the Civil Rights Acts. It appears to arise from exercise of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Swope, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Adams v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. United States Ex Rel. Wagner v. RagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilbur E. Sullivan v. Sgt. Ford, Classification OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Edward Kimble v. Department of Corrections, State of Michigan George A. Kropp, Warden Leo Lafay, Keith Adams, and Buster BunchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Harold Arthur Hill v. American Express Money Order Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API