Legal Opinion
Lippmann v. Hydro-Space Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 25, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 811-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge:
In this action, seeking both money damages and equitable relief, the plaintiff, a resident of the State of Texas, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court by reason of his diverse citizenship from that of the twelve defendants, and the alleged involvement of the jurisdictional minimum required under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1). The defendants are Hydro-Space Technology, Inc. (hereinafter Hydro-Space), its former president, Imperial ‘400’ National, Inc. (hereinafter Imperial), Imperial’s affiliate Four Hundred Construction Company (hereinafter Four Hundred), six former…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Barrow v. HuntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Burkhardt v. LibertyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re De ManatiDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
- In re de ManatíDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972