Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sutton v. Hartley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1933No. 24160. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The relators are members of a committee appointed by the senate of the state of Washington for the session of 1931. They brought this action for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as governor, to give them access to, and permit them to examine, the books, records and accounts of his own office and the offices under his control. From a judgment ordering the writ to issue, defendant appeals.

On the hearing in this court, respondents presented a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the questions involved had become moot by reason of the expiration of the life of the committee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Vollman v. Industrial Workers of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Daniels v. ProsserWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Taylor v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wilson v. FraserWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API