Legal Opinion
Siverling v. Lee
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 10, 1950No. Civ. 8049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The Court has before it a motion to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, a non resident of Michigan, the Administrator of the Estate of one Howard C. Baum, deceased, appointed by the Probate Court for the County of Ashland, Ohio, on the ground that he does not have the capacity to bring this action under the Michigan statutes.
Sec. 27.3178(278) of the Michigan Statutes Annotated, Comp.Laws 1948, § 704.27, provides: “It is hereby declared to be the public policy of this state to require that all persons acting in a representative capacity under appointment of a probate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Baker v. SlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Wiener v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carder v. MarhoffDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
- Hardy v. MaxheimerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hardy v. MaxheimerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Weissfeld v. Herman Miller, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968