Legal Opinion
Lawrence D. Mungin v. Katten Muchin & Zavis, A/K/A Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman, F/d/b/a Katten Muchin Zavis & Dombroff
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-7152Published
1Opinion of the Court
116 F.3d 1549
74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 391,
71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,862, 325 U.S.App.D.C. 373
Lawrence D. MUNGIN, Appellee,
v.
KATTEN MUCHIN & ZAVIS, a/k/a Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman,
f/d/b/a Katten Muchin Zavis & Dombroff, Appellant.
No. 96-7152.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 22, 1997.
Decided July 8, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (94cv02286).
Andrew L. Frey, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Donald M. Falk.
Abbey G. Hairston, Baltimore, MD, argued the cause for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.